Q.8 Sourya committee had proposed the establishment of Sourya Institutes of Technology (SITs) in line
with Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) to cater to the technological and industrial needs of a
developing country.
Which of the following can be logically inferred from the above sentence?
Based on the proposal,
(i) In the initial years, SIT students will get degrees from IIT.
(ii) SITs will have a distinct national objective.
(iii) SIT like institutions can only be established in consultation with IIT.
(iv) SITs will serve technological needs of a developing country.
(A) (iii) and (iv) only. (B) (i) and (iv) only.
(C) (ii) and (iv) only. (D) (ii) and (iii) only

You’re asking about a logical inference question based on a statement about the Sourya Committee and Sourya Institutes of Technology (SITs), and you want a full SEO‑friendly article around it.

Introduction

Logical inference questions are very common in competitive exams like aptitude tests, CSAT, and management entrance exams. One such question is based on the Sourya Committee and its proposal to establish Sourya Institutes of Technology (SITs) in line with the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs).

In this article, we will analyze the given statement, evaluate each option carefully, and find the correct answer using proper logical reasoning. This will help you understand how to approach similar logical inference questions in exams.

Understanding the Given Statement

The statement says:

“Sourya committee had proposed the establishment of Sourya Institutes of Technology (SITs) in line with Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) to cater to the technological and industrial needs of a developing country.”

Key points from this sentence:

• SITs are proposed by the Sourya Committee.

• SITs are to be in line with IITs (i.e., similar model/structure/standard).

• Main purpose: to cater to the technological and industrial needs of a developing country.

Any logical inference must be strictly based on this information only, without adding extra assumptions.

Option-wise Explanation

Statement (i):

“In the initial years, SIT students will get degrees from IIT.”

Nothing in the given sentence talks about degrees, affiliation, or IIT awarding degrees to SIT students. It only says SITs are established “in line with IITs,” which means similar pattern or model, not that they are part of IITs or under IITs.

• This is an extra assumption, not logically guaranteed by the statement.

• Therefore, (i) cannot be inferred.

Statement (ii):

“SITs will have a distinct national objective.”

The sentence says SITs will be established in line with IITs to cater to technological and industrial needs of a developing country. This clearly indicates that SITs are being set up with a specific national purpose related to technology and industry.

• “To cater to the technological and industrial needs” implies a clear, targeted national objective.

• So it is reasonable and logically valid to say that SITs will have a distinct national objective.

Therefore, (ii) can be logically inferred.

Statement (iii):

“SIT like institutions can only be established in consultation with IIT.”

The statement does not mention anything about consultation with IIT or any condition that IIT must be involved in establishing SIT-like institutions.

• “In line with IITs” means following their pattern or model, not necessarily consulting IITs.

• The word “only” makes this even stronger and restrictive, which is not supported by the original sentence.

Therefore, (iii) cannot be logically inferred.

Statement (iv):

“SITs will serve technological needs of a developing country.”

The original sentence explicitly says that the purpose of SITs is “to cater to the technological and industrial needs of a developing country.”

• “Serve technological needs” matches directly with “cater to the technological needs.”

• This is clearly and directly stated in the sentence, not an assumption.

Therefore, (iv) can be logically inferred.

Evaluating the Options

Now combine the valid statements:

• (ii) is logically inferred.

• (iv) is logically inferred.

So we need the option that contains (ii) and (iv) only.

Check the given options:

• (A) (iii) and (iv) only → incorrect (iii is not valid).

• (B) (i) and (iv) only → incorrect (i is not valid).

• (C) (ii) and (iv) only → correct.

• (D) (ii) and (iii) only → incorrect (iii is not valid).

Correct Answer

Correct Option: (C) (ii) and (iv) only