Q.52 Match List I with List II LIST I LIST II A. Hedysarum cornutum L. 1763 (=) Hedysarum spinosum L. 1759 I. Tautonym B. Acacia nilotica ssp. nilotica II. Nothospecies C. Malus malus III. Nomenclatural synonym D. Salix aurita × Salix caprea IV. Autonym Choose the correct answer from the options given below: A-I, B-II, C-IV, D-III A-III, B-IV, C-I, D-II A-II, B-I, C-III, D-IV A-IV, B-III, C-II, D-I

Q.52 Match List I with List II

LIST I LIST II
A. Hedysarum cornutum L. 1763 (=)
Hedysarum spinosum L. 1759
I. Tautonym
B. Acacia nilotica ssp. nilotica II. Nothospecies
C. Malus malus III. Nomenclatural synonym
D. Salix aurita × Salix caprea IV. Autonym

Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

  1. A-I, B-II, C-IV, D-III
  2. A-III, B-IV, C-I, D-II
  3. A-II, B-I, C-III, D-IV
  4. A-IV, B-III, C-II, D-I

    The correct matching for Q.52 is A-III, B-IV, C-I, D-II.

    Detailed Matching Explanation

    A. Hedysarum cornutum L. 1763 (=) Hedysarum spinosum L. 1759 → III. Nomenclatural synonym: The “=” indicates nomenclatural synonyms—different names for the same taxonH. spinosum (1759, earlier) is the senior synonym; H. cornutum (1763) is illegitimate as a later homotypic synonym under ICN Art. 11.1, 52.

    B. Acacia nilotica ssp. nilotica → IV. Autonym: An autonym is automatically created when a subspecies is named under a species; the subspecies bearing the species epithet (ssp. nilotica under A. nilotica) is the autonym (ICN Art. H.6). No separate publication needed.

    C. Malus malus → I. Tautonym: A tautonym has identical genus and species epithets (genus + species = same word), forbidden in ICN Art. 23.4 for vascular plants (e.g., Musa malus would be valid, but Malus malus invalid).

    D. Salix aurita × Salix caprea → II. Nothospecies: Hybrid taxa between species get “×” notation and “nothotaxon” status (ICN H.3); Salix aurita × caprea names a hybrid willow species, validly published as such.

    Incorrect Options Explained

    A-I, B-II, C-IV, D-III: Wrong—Synonyms aren’t tautonyms; autonyms ≠ nothospecies; Malus malus isn’t autonym.

    A-III, B-IV, C-I, D-IICorrect—Matches ICN definitions precisely.

    A-II, B-I, C-III, D-IV: Wrong—Hedysarum pair aren’t hybrids; Acacia ssp. nilotica isn’t tautonym.

    A-IV, B-III, C-II, D-I: Wrong—Hedysarum not autonym; Malus malus not nothospecies.

    Introduction
    Match List I with List II tests botanical nomenclature: Hedysarum cornutum = H. spinosum (A-III: nomenclatural synonym), Acacia nilotica ssp. nilotica (B-IV: autonym), Malus malus (C-I: tautonym), Salix aurita × caprea (D-II: nothospecies). ICN Articles 11, 23, H.3, H.6 govern these.

    Nomenclature Terms Defined

    Term ICN Basis Example from List
    Nomenclatural synonym Art. 11, 52 A (= same taxon, different names)
    Autonym H.6 B (ssp. repeats species name)
    Tautonym Art. 23.4 (forbidden) C (genus = species epithet)
    Nothospecies H.3 D (× hybrid taxon)

    Key Rules Recap

    • Seniority: Earlier legitimate name (H. spinosum 1759) prevails.

    • Autonyms automatic: No authority citation needed.

    • Tautonyms banned in plants/animals (unlike fungi).

    • Hybrids: “×” before/after species or between parents.

    Exam Strategy

    Remember: “=” = synonym; “ssp. [species name]” = autonym; identical words = tautonym; “×” = nothospecies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Courses