Q. 10 X is an online media provider. By offering unlimited and exclusive online content at attractive prices
for a loyalty membership, X is almost forcing its customers towards its loyalty membership. If its loyalty
membership continues to grow at its current rate, within the next eight years more households will be
watching X than cable television.
Which one of the following statements can be inferred from the above paragraph?
(A)Most households that subscribe to X’s loyalty membership discontinue watching cable television
(B) Non-members prefer to watch cable television
(C) Cable television operators don’t subscribe to X’s loyalty membership
(D) The X is cancelling accounts of non-members

Here’s a complete, SEO-optimized article on the logical reasoning question from the query. I’ve crafted it for readers preparing for exams like CLAT, CAT, or competitive tests, focusing on inference-based questions in reading comprehension. The key phrase is “X online media provider loyalty inference question”.

X Online Media Provider Loyalty Inference Question: Correct Answer & Option-Wise Explanation

Are you tackling tricky inference questions in competitive exams like CLAT, CAT, or logical reasoning tests? The “X online media provider loyalty” scenario is a classic example. It tests your ability to draw valid conclusions from projections without assuming unstated details. This article breaks down the paragraph, identifies the correct answer, and explains every option (A-D) step-by-step.

In exams, inference means something must logically follow from the given info—no leaps or external assumptions allowed. Let’s dive in.

The Question and Paragraph

Paragraph: “X is an online media provider. By offering unlimited and exclusive online content at attractive prices for a loyalty membership, X is almost forcing its customers towards its loyalty membership. If its loyalty membership continues to grow at its current rate, within the next eight years more households will be watching X than cable television.”

Question: Which one of the following statements can be inferred from the above paragraph?

Options:

• (A) Most households that subscribe to X’s loyalty membership discontinue watching cable television

• (B) Non-members prefer to watch cable television

• (C) Cable television operators don’t subscribe to X’s loyalty membership

• (D) X is cancelling accounts of non-members

Upon close reading, no option is directly inferable without assumptions. However, in standard exam contexts (like CLAT), the projection implies a shift from cable to X loyalty members. Many analyses point to (A) as the intended inference because growth to surpass cable TV suggests loyalty subscribers replace cable watchers.

But strictly? The paragraph doesn’t state discontinuation—it predicts dominance via growth. For exam prep, treat (A) as correct per common interpretations, as it aligns with the “forcing” towards loyalty and surpassing cable.

Detailed Explanation of All Options

Let’s evaluate each option against the paragraph. Inference requires the statement to be necessarily true based only on the text.

• Option (A): Most households that subscribe to X’s loyalty membership discontinue watching cable television
  This is the strongest candidate. The paragraph says loyalty growth will make X surpass cable TV households in 8 years. “Forcing” customers to loyalty implies they switch from cable (or other options) to X. While not explicit, the projection of “more households watching X than cable” logically suggests many loyalty members drop cable. Inferable? Partially yes—intended correct answer in most analyses.

• Option (B): Non-members prefer to watch cable television
  No support here. The paragraph doesn’t mention non-members’ preferences or viewing habits. It focuses on loyalty growth overtaking cable, ignoring non-members entirely. This adds unsupported info. Not inferable.

• Option (C): Cable television operators don’t subscribe to X’s loyalty membership
  Irrelevant and unstated. The text discusses households watching X vs. cable, not operators subscribing. Operators aren’t even implied as customers. Pure assumption. Not inferable.

• Option (D): X is cancelling accounts of non-members
  Nothing suggests cancellations. “Forcing” means attractive pricing nudges toward loyalty, not forced termination. The growth is projected from current rates, not policy changes. Not inferable.

Why This Tests Inference Skills

The trap lies in the future projection: “If loyalty grows… more households will watch X than cable.” This implies replacement but doesn’t confirm causation (e.g., households might watch both). Option (A) bridges closest without extras. Practice tip: Stick to what’s given—avoid “most” if unquantified, but exam logic often accepts it.

For X online media provider loyalty inference question prep, similar questions appear in CLAT RC sections. Master by paraphrasing projections.