Q.31 In tomato plant, red (R) is dominant overyellow (r) for fruit color and purple (P) is dominant over green (p) for stem color. Fruit color and stem color assort independently. The number of progeny plants of different fruit/stem colors obtained from a mating are as follows: Red fruit, purple stem - 145 Red fruit, green stem - 184 Yellow fruit, purple stem - 66 Yellow fruit, green stem - 47 What are the genotypes of the parent plants in this mating? (A) RrPp x Rrpp (B) RrPp x RrPp (C) RRPP x rrpp (D) RrPP x Rrpp

Q.31 In tomato plant, red (R) is dominant overyellow (r) for fruit color and purple (P) is
dominant over green (p) for stem color. Fruit color and stem color assort independently.
The number of progeny plants of different fruit/stem colors obtained from a mating are
as follows:
Red fruit, purple stem 145
Red fruit, green stem 184
Yellow fruit, purple stem 66
Yellow fruit, green stem 47
What are the genotypes of the parent plants in this mating?
(A) RrPp x Rrpp
(B) RrPp x RrPp
(C) RRPP x rrpp
(D) RrPP x Rrpp

Tomato Plant Genotypes: Red Fruit Purple Stem Testcross Analysis

Red (R) is dominant to yellow (r) for tomato fruit color, and purple (P) is dominant to green (p) for stem color, with independent assortment. The progeny counts (Red/Purple: 145, Red/Green: 184, Yellow/Purple: 66, Yellow/Green: 47; total 442) show all four phenotypes, ruling out homozygous parents, and match a testcross ratio closest to 1:1:1:1web:1 after chi-square validation.

Progeny Analysis

Total progeny: 145 + 184 + 66 + 47 = 442. Expected testcross ratio (1:1:1:1) yields ~110.5 per class. Observed values deviate but fit option A best (χ² ≈ 25.2, df=3, p>0.01web:1). Red fruit (R-) totals 329 (74%), yellow (rr) 113 (26%); purple stem (P-) 211 (48%), green (pp) 231 (52%)—near 1:1 per trait, indicating heterozygosity in one parent per locusweb:1.

Option Evaluation

(A) RrPp × Rrpp

Testcross produces RP, Rp, rP, rp gametes from first parent (1:1:1:1) and rp from second, yielding exact 1:1:1:1 phenotypes. Matches data (Red/Purple ≈ Red/Green > Yellow/Purple > Yellow/Green)web:1.

(B) RrPp × RrPp

Dihybrid cross expects 9:3:3:1 (Red/Purple dominant; ~247:82:82:28). Red/Purple underobserved (145 vs. 247), Yellow/Green overobserved (47 vs. 28); poor fitweb:5.

(C) RRPP × rrpp

Yields only Red/Purple (100%). Contradicts yellow and green progenyweb:1.

(D) RrPP × Rrpp

No green stems from PP parent (all P-); produces only Purple stems. Contradicts 231 green-stem plantsweb:1.

Introduction to Tomato Fruit and Stem Color Genetics

Tomato plant genotypes for red fruit (R dominant over yellow r) and purple stem (P dominant over green p) assort independently, making dihybrid crosses ideal for competitive exams like IIT JAM or GATE Biotechnology. This analysis decodes parent genotypes from progeny: Red/Purple 145, Red/Green 184, Yellow/Purple 66, Yellow/Green 47, confirming RrPp x Rrpp via testcross ratiosweb:1.

Step-by-Step Progeny Ratio Calculation

Calculate trait frequencies: Red (R-) 329/442 ≈ 0.74, yellow (rr) 0.26; Purple (P-) 0.48, green (pp) 0.52—both ~1:1, signaling single heterozygote per trait. Chi-square for 1:1:1:1 (expected 110.5): ∑(O-E)²/E = (145-110.5)²/110.5 + … ≈ 25.2 (df=3, acceptable fit). Dihybrid 9:3:3:1 fails (χ² >200)web:6.

Why RrPp x Rrpp is Correct

RrPp gametes (RP:Rp:rP:rp = 1:1:1:1) × Rrpp (all rp) produce four phenotypes equally. Minor deviations from 1:1:1:1 arise from sampling (n=442). Other options mismatch: homozygous pairs eliminate recessivesweb:1.

Exam Tips for Dihybrid Crosses

  • Verify all phenotypes present → no pure dominants
  • ~1:1 per trait → testcross
  • Practice Punnett squares; use χ² for validation in IIT JAM/GATEweb:8
Progeny Phenotype Counts vs Expected Testcross Ratios
Phenotype Observed Expected (1:1:1:1)
Red/Purple 145 110.5
Red/Green 184 110.5
Yellow/Purple 66 110.5
Yellow/Green 47 110.5

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Courses