Q. 13 According to VSEPR theory, the species that has the smallest F-X-F angle (where 𝐗 = central atom)is
(A) BF3
(B) PF3
(C) BF4−
(D) IF4−
The correct answer is (D) IF4−, which has the smallest F–X–F bond angle among the given species according to VSEPR theory. The presence of lone pairs on the central atom in IF4− causes strong lone pair–bond pair repulsions, compressing the F–I–F angles more than in the other options.
Question and correct answer
According to VSEPR theory, the species that has the smallest F–X–F angle (where X is the central atom) is IF4−, option (D).
-
IF4− has:
-
Central atom I with 7 valence electrons plus 1 extra (negative charge) and 4 I–F bonds.
-
Total 8 electrons (4 pairs) used in bonding and 2 electrons (1 lone pair) left, so there are 5 electron pairs (4 bond pairs + 1 lone pair).
-
Electron-pair geometry: trigonal bipyramidal; molecular shape: seesaw or distorted square planar description depending on representation, but in all realistic VSEPR treatments, one lone pair on a 5‑pair arrangement causes significant bond angle compression.
-
-
Lone pair–bond pair repulsions are stronger than bond pair–bond pair repulsions, so the F–I–F angles become smaller than typical tetrahedral or trigonal planar angles.
Because IF4− has both a high coordination (four F atoms) and at least one lone pair on a relatively large central atom, the F–I–F angle is most strongly compressed, giving the smallest F–X–F angle among the four species.
Option (A) BF3: geometry and F–B–F angle
-
BF3 is a classic trigonal planar molecule.
-
Boron has 3 valence electrons and forms three B–F bonds with no lone pair on boron.
-
Electron pair arrangement: 3 bond pairs, 0 lone pairs.
-
Predicted bond angle from VSEPR: F–B–F angles are 120° in a perfect trigonal planar geometry, so there is no compression by lone pairs.
Because 120° is relatively large and symmetric with only bond pairs, BF3 does not have the smallest F–X–F angle; instead, its angle is larger than in species where lone pairs compress the angle, such as PF3 or IF4−.
Option (B) PF3: geometry and F–P–F angle
-
PF3 has a central phosphorus atom with 5 valence electrons forming three P–F bonds and holding one lone pair.
-
This gives 3 bond pairs + 1 lone pair, so the electron pair geometry is tetrahedral, but the molecular shape is trigonal pyramidal, analogous to NH3.
-
In a perfect tetrahedral environment, bond angles are 109.5°, but the presence of a lone pair increases repulsion and pushes the bonding pairs closer together, so the F–P–F angle becomes less than 109.5°.
Because there is one lone pair, PF3 does have a compressed bond angle compared with BF3 (120°), but the compression is not as extreme as in a 5‑pair system with a lone pair such as IF4−, so PF3 does not show the smallest F–X–F angle in this list.
Option (C) BF4−: geometry and F–B–F angle
-
In BF4−, boron has 3 valence electrons plus one more bonding interaction, forming four B–F bonds, and the extra negative charge corresponds to an extra electron in the bonding system; boron effectively has 4 bond pairs and no lone pairs.
-
Electron pair geometry: tetrahedral with 4 bond pairs, 0 lone pairs.
-
Ideal F–B–F bond angle: 109.5° in a regular tetrahedron, because no lone pairs are present to distort the geometry.
Since 109.5° is still larger than the angle compressed by lone pairs in IF4− and there is no lone pair to cause extra compression, BF4− cannot have the smallest F–X–F angle among these species. Its angle lies between BF3 (120°) and lone‑pair–containing, more distorted systems like IF4−.
Option (D) IF4−: geometry, lone pairs and smallest F–I–F angle
-
For IF4−:
-
Iodine (group 17) has 7 valence electrons, plus one extra due to the negative charge, making 8 valence electrons.
-
It forms four I–F bonds, using 4 electron pairs; 4 pairs used for bonding leave 0 or 2 electrons depending on the specific distribution, so at least one lone pair exists on iodine in the common VSEPR model for such polyfluorides.
-
-
With four bond pairs and at least one lone pair on a central atom in a higher coordination environment (5 total electron domains), the molecular shape is described as a distorted seesaw/square‑planar‑like arrangement and the F–I–F angles are significantly compressed.
-
Lone pair–bond pair repulsions in this 5‑domain system are stronger and act over more directions than in a simple tetrahedral system, causing F–I–F angles to drop below the typical 109.5° tetrahedral value and even lower than in PF3.
Therefore, IF4− experiences the greatest angular compression and is correctly identified as the species with the smallest F–X–F angle in this question, making option (D) the correct answer.


