1. A majority of humans with normal colour vision was found to be more sensitive to red light in Rayleigh match, where the subject mixed variable amount of red and green light to match monochromatic orange. Which one of the following statements is NOT true to explain the observation ?
    (1) There are variations in the sensitivity of long-wave cone pigments.
    (2) The short-wave cone opsin in red- sensitive subjects is different from others.
    (3) The absorption curve of long-wave cone pigment peaks at 556 nm in red-sensitive subjects while it peaks at 552 nm in others.
    (4) The long-wave cone opsin in red-sensitive subjects is different in primary structure from that of other.


    The Rayleigh match test is a classic method used to study color vision by mixing red and green light to match a monochromatic orange light. Among people with normal color vision, there is variability in sensitivity to red light, often related to differences in the properties of cone photopigments, particularly the long-wavelength (L) cones.

    Factors Explaining Variation in Red Sensitivity

    • Long-wave cone pigment variations: Differences in the L-cone pigment’s amino acid sequence and structure lead to slight shifts in the absorption spectrum (peak wavelength shifts by a few nanometers).

    • Peak sensitivity differences: For example, in red-sensitive individuals, the absorption peak of L-cone pigment may be around 556 nm, versus around 552 nm in others.pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih

    • Opsin protein structure: Changes in the primary structure of the long-wave opsin protein can account for sensitivity shifts, influencing color perception.pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih

    Evaluating the Statements

    • (1) Variations in sensitivity of long-wave cone pigments: True, explaining red sensitivity variability.

    • (2) Short-wave cone opsin differs in red-sensitive subjects: False; red sensitivity differences are linked to long-wave cones (L cones), while short-wave (S) cones are responsible for blue vision and are not typically implicated in red-green sensitivity.

    • (3) Absorption peak differences of L-cone pigment (556 nm vs 552 nm): True.

    • (4) Primary structure variation of long-wave opsin in red-sensitive subjects: True.

    Therefore, the incorrect statement is:

    (2) The short-wave cone opsin in red-sensitive subjects is different from others.


    Conclusion

    Red sensitivity variation in normal color vision is primarily due to differences in the long-wave cone opsin, not the short-wave cone opsin. This explains the variation in Rayleigh match outcomes observed in normal individuals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Courses