Q.61 Wanted Temporary, Part-time persons for the post of Field Interviewer to conduct personal
interviews to collect and collate economic data. Requirements: High School-pass, must be
available for Day, Evening and Saturday work. Transportation paid, expenses reimbursed.
Which one of the following is the best inference from the above advertisement?
(A) Gender-discriminatory
(B) Xenophobic
(C) Not designed to make the post attractive
(D) Not gender-discriminatory
Reading comprehension inference questions in SSC CGL, IBPS, and UPSC test your ability to draw logical conclusions from passages like advertisements. Question 61 presents a job ad for Field Interviewers (temporary, part-time) with requirements (High School-pass, flexible hours) and benefits (transportation paid, expenses reimbursed). Options: (A) Gender-discriminatory, (B) Xenophobic, (C) Not designed to make the post attractive, (D) Not gender-discriminatory.
Correct Answer: Option (D) Not gender-discriminatory
The ad uses neutral language (“persons”) without any gender-specific terms, pronouns, or biases. It focuses solely on qualifications, availability, and perks, making “not gender-discriminatory” the clearest inference. Modern job ads avoid gender markers to promote inclusivity.
Detailed Explanation of All Options
Inference questions reward precise reading—eliminate extremes unsupported by text.
Option (A): Gender-discriminatory (Incorrect)
-
No mention of gender; “persons” is inclusive for all.
-
Lacks evidence like “males only” or stereotypes.
Option (B): Xenophobic (Incorrect)
-
Zero reference to nationality, origin, or foreigners.
-
Focuses on skills and availability, not demographics.
Option (C): Not designed to make the post attractive (Incorrect)
-
Lists positives: paid transport, reimbursed expenses, flexible part-time work.
-
Clearly aims to appeal to qualified candidates.
Option (D): Not gender-discriminatory (Correct)
-
Neutral phrasing throughout; inclusive “persons” signals fairness.
-
Aligns with anti-discrimination standards.
| Option | Key Evidence from Ad | Valid Inference? | Why/Why Not |
|---|---|---|---|
| (A) Gender-discriminatory | “Persons” (neutral) | No | No bias indicators |
| (B) Xenophobic | No nationality mention | No | Irrelevant to content |
| (C) Not designed to attract | “Transportation paid, expenses reimbursed” | No | Highlights benefits |
| (D) Not gender-discriminatory | Inclusive language only | Yes | Promotes equality |
Strategies for Inference Questions
For best inference from advertisement, identify what’s explicitly absent (e.g., no gender cues) versus present (perks). Avoid assuming unstated negatives. Read options backward: eliminate extremes first (discriminatory claims need proof).
Pro Tip: Practice 30+ RC passages daily. Note: SSC favors “neutral/inclusive” over controversial inferences. Build speed to 2 minutes per question.
