14. The upper line in the figure below shows the locations of four genes on the
genetic map of an organism; the lower line shows the locations of the same four genes
on a physical map derived from the nucleotide sequence of the DNA of that organism.
The maps are not identical because:
a. genetic maps cannot provide any information about gene positions
b. recombination frequencies per kb of DNA are not uniform across a chromosome
c. the farther apart two genes are, the more likely they are to recombine
d. the closer two genes are, the more likely they are to recombine
The correct answer is Option B: Recombination frequencies per kb of DNA are not uniform across a chromosome.
Introduction
Genetic maps and physical maps often show the same genes in the same order, yet the distances between genes on these maps can differ dramatically because recombination is not uniform along chromosomes. Understanding this disparity between genetic map vs physical map recombination frequency is essential for solving linkage‑mapping MCQs and interpreting genome mapping data in exams like CSIR NET Life Sciences.
Understanding genetic and physical maps
A genetic map measures distances in centiMorgans (cM) and is constructed from recombination frequencies; one map unit roughly equals a 1% recombination rate between two loci. A physical map records the actual DNA length between genes in base pairs or kilobases, often derived from the nucleotide sequence of the chromosome.
Because crossing over is more frequent in some regions (recombination hotspots) and suppressed in others (cold spots), the same physical distance can correspond to very different genetic distances. As a result, the spacing of genes on a genetic map does not scale linearly with the spacing on a physical map, even though the gene order usually remains consistent.
Why the maps are not identical (correct option B)
In the question, the upper line represents a genetic map and the lower line represents a physical map obtained from DNA sequence data; the gene order is the same but inter‑gene distances differ. This mismatch occurs because recombination frequencies per kb of DNA vary along the chromosome, so one kilobase in a hotspot contributes more cM than one kilobase in a cold spot.
Empirical studies in humans and plants show that recombination rates can range from nearly 0 to several cM per megabase within the same chromosome, producing deserts (low recombination) and jungles (high recombination). Therefore, genetic distance (cM) and physical distance (kb) have a nonlinear relationship, explaining why the two maps are not identical and confirming Option B as correct.
Detailed analysis of each option
Option A: “Genetic maps cannot provide any information about gene positions”
This statement is incorrect because genetic maps are explicitly used to determine the relative positions and order of genes based on recombination data. Linkage analysis uses recombination frequencies to place loci along chromosomes, allowing construction of gene maps long before complete genome sequences are available.
While genetic maps give approximate rather than absolute distances, they clearly do provide information about where genes lie with respect to one another. Hence, A does not explain the difference between the two maps in the question.
Option B: “Recombination frequencies per kb of DNA are not uniform across a chromosome”
This statement is correct and captures the biological reason the genetic and physical maps differ. Recombination events cluster into hotspots where crossing over is frequent and cold spots where it is rare, meaning that equal physical segments can have very different recombination rates.
Because a genetic map is scaled in cM, segments with higher recombination contribute larger genetic distances than physically similar segments with lower recombination, distorting proportionality between the two maps. Therefore, non‑uniform recombination frequency per kb is exactly why the maps in the question are not identical.
Option C: “The farther apart two genes are, the more likely they are to recombine”
This statement is generally true for linked genes: recombination frequency tends to increase with physical distance up to a maximum of about 50%. However, this principle holds on average and does not by itself explain discrepancies between the scale of genetic and physical maps along different regions of the same chromosome.
Even if recombination increased smoothly with distance, proportionality between cM and kb could still hold; the actual problem is that the rate of recombination per unit physical distance changes from region to region due to hotspots and cold spots. Thus, C is a true statement about linkage but is not the reason the two maps shown in the question differ.
Option D: “The closer two genes are, the more likely they are to recombine”
Option D is incorrect because it reverses the fundamental relationship between distance and recombination: closely linked genes show low recombination frequencies and tend to be inherited together. The probability of a crossover occurring between two loci decreases as they become physically closer, not higher.
Therefore, D contradicts basic linkage mapping concepts and cannot explain the mismatch between genetic and physical maps in the figure.
Key takeaways for exams
For MCQs comparing genetic and physical maps, remember the following points about genetic map vs physical map recombination frequency.
-
Genetic maps: distances in cM, derived from recombination frequencies, approximate and non‑linear with bp.
-
Physical maps: distances in bp or kb, derived from DNA sequence or clone overlaps, show absolute spacing.
-
Non‑uniform recombination (hotspots and cold spots) across chromosomes causes equal kb intervals to have different cM, so genetic and physical maps are not identical, even when gene order is the same.