Q.22 The degree of inhibition for an enzyme catalyzed reaction at a particular inhibitor concentration is independent of initial substrate concentration. The inhibition follows (A) Competitive inhibition (B) Mixed inhibition (C) Un-competitive inhibition (D) Non-competitive inhibition

Q.22 The degree of inhibition for an enzyme catalyzed reaction at a particular inhibitor concentration is independent of initial substrate concentration. The inhibition follows

  • (A) Competitive inhibition
  • (B) Mixed inhibition
  • (C) Un-competitive inhibition
  • (D) Non-competitive inhibition

    Enzyme Inhibition: Independent of Substrate Concentration

    Non-competitive inhibition uniquely maintains constant inhibition degree regardless of substrate levels. This MCQ tests recognition of enzyme kinetics where inhibitor binding is unaffected by substrate concentration.

    Correct Answer: (D) Non-competitive inhibition

    Non-competitive inhibitors bind to an allosteric site on both free enzyme (E) and enzyme-substrate complex (ES) with equal affinity. This maintains constant % inhibition regardless of [S], as the inhibitor: substrate ratio determines inhibition degree, not competition.

    Key diagnostic: Vmax ↓↓, Km unchanged

    Inhibition Types Comparison

    Type Binding Site % Inhibition vs [S] Vmax Km Lineweaver-Burk
    (A) Competitive Active site only ↓ as [S] ↑ Unchanged ↑↑ X-intercept shifts right
    (B) Mixed Allosteric (E ≠ ES affinity) ↓ but not eliminated ↓↓ ↑ or ↓ Lines intersect left of Y-axis
    (C) Uncompetitive ES complex only ↑ as [S] ↑ ↓↓ ↓↓ Parallel lines
    (D) Non-competitive
    CORRECT
    Allosteric (E = ES affinity) CONSTANT ↓↓ Unchanged Intersect on X-axis

    Detailed Option Analysis

    (A) Competitive Inhibition – Incorrect

    Inhibitor competes with substrate for active site. High [S] outcompetes inhibitor, reducing % inhibition.
    Diagnostic: Vmax normal, Km ↑↑

    (B) Mixed Inhibition – Incorrect

    Inhibitor binds allosteric site but with different affinity for E vs ES. % inhibition decreases (but not eliminated) with ↑[S] due to competitive component.

    (C) Uncompetitive Inhibition – Incorrect

    Inhibitor binds only ES complex. As [S] ↑, more ES forms → more inhibition → % inhibition increases with substrate.

    (D) Non-competitive Inhibition – Correct

    Equal affinity for E and ES ensures constant fraction inhibited regardless of [S]. Inhibitor traps enzyme in unproductive conformation.

    Lineweaver-Burk Proof

    Non-competitive inhibition signature:

    text
    1/v = (Kₘ/Vₘₐₓ)(1/[S]) + (1/Vₘₐₓ)[I]/[I] → Lines intersect X-axis (1/-Kₘ)

    Constant [I]: Y-intercept ↑ (Vₘₐₓ ↓), slope unchanged → same Kₘ

    Biotechnology Applications

    • Drug design: Non-competitive inhibitors (statins, protease inhibitors) maintain efficacy despite variable substrate

    • Kinase inhibitors: Cancer therapies target allosteric sites

    • Exam tip: “Independent of [S]” = Non-competitive only

    Memory Table

    text
    SUBSTRATE DEPENDENCE:
    • Competitive: % inhibition ↓↓↓ with ↑[S]
    • Non-competitive: % inhibition = CONSTANT
    • Uncompetitive: % inhibition ↑↑↑ with ↑[S]

    Memorize: Constant inhibition degree = Non-competitive (Vₘₐₓ ↓, Kₘ unchanged)t

  • ndependent-substrate-concentration-mcq
    Meta Description: The degree of inhibition independent of substrate concentration identifies non-competitive inhibition. Detailed Lineweaver-Burk analysis and biotech exam explanation of all enzyme inhibition types.
    Key Phrase: enzyme inhibition substrate concentration independen

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Courses