- Which of the following host systems is best suited to express large amounts of glycosylated protein for structural studies?
(1) GST fusion protein in E. coli
(2) His-tagged protein in E. coli
(3) Native protein in Baculovirus
(4) Native protein in Pseudomonas fluorescensThe best host system is (3) Native protein in Baculovirus.
Option-wise explanation
-
(1) GST fusion protein in E. coli
-
E. coli is prokaryotic and lacks N‑ and O‑linked glycosylation pathways.
-
GST tag aids solubility and purification but the expressed protein will be non‑glycosylated, unsuitable when proper glycosylation is needed.
-
-
(2) His‑tagged protein in E. coli
-
Same limitation: His-tag only helps purification; E. coli still cannot perform complex eukaryotic glycosylation.
-
Good for large quantities of simple proteins, not glycoproteins.
-
-
(3) Native protein in Baculovirus – correct
-
Baculovirus–insect cell systems (e.g., Sf9, High Five) are eukaryotic and contain ER and Golgi machinery capable of N‑linked glycosylation and some O‑glycosylation.
-
They routinely produce milligram quantities of properly folded, post‑translationally modified proteins suitable for X‑ray crystallography and cryo‑EM.
-
Glycosylation patterns may not be identical to mammalian, but are far closer than bacterial systems and are generally adequate for structural work.
-
-
(4) Native protein in Pseudomonas fluorescens
-
P. fluorescens is also a bacterium; despite some engineered systems, standard strains do not provide complex eukaryotic glycosylation.
-
So it is not the best choice for glycosylated protein for structural studies.
-
Therefore, the host system that best matches “large amounts of glycosylated protein for structural studies” is native protein expressed using the baculovirus system (option 3).
-