Q.55 A 500 nm light is used for imaging in a confocal microscope. What will be the
best resolution (in nm) of this microscope?
The best resolution of a confocal microscope using 500 nm light is 180 nm, determined by the confocal-specific Abbe diffraction limit formula. This value assumes optimal conditions with a high numerical aperture (NA) objective, typical for such exam questions. Confocal microscopy improves resolution over widefield by rejecting out-of-focus light via a pinhole.
Resolution Formula
Lateral resolution in confocal microscopy follows d=0.4λ/NA or the full-width half-maximum (FWHM) approximation 0.51λ/NA, where λ=500 nm. High-end oil-immersion objectives achieve NA ≈ 1.4, yielding d≈0.51×500/1.4≈182 nm, rounded to 180 nm in standard references and CSIR NET contexts. Axial resolution is poorer at ~500 nm but the question specifies “best resolution,” referring to superior lateral XY resolution.
Step-by-Step Calculation
Start with Abbe’s limit for widefield: d=0.61λ/NA≈0.61×500/1.4≈218 nm. Confocal pinhole (at ~1 Airy unit) enhances this by √2 factor (~1.4×), reducing to ~0.43 λ / NA or 0.51 λ / NA for FWHM, giving 180 nm. For 500 nm green light and NA=1.4, sources confirm ~180 nm lateral as the practical best.
Option Analysis (Typical MCQ)
CSIR NET-style options likely include 125 nm, 180 nm, 250 nm, 500 nm (based on exam patterns).
-
125 nm: Super-resolution territory (STED/SIM), beyond confocal diffraction limit.
-
180 nm: Correct; confocal optimal lateral resolution.
-
250 nm: Widefield Abbe limit or lower NA (~1.0).
-
500 nm: Wavelength itself or axial resolution.
CSIR NET Application
This question tests diffraction limit understanding in confocal vs. widefield microscopy, key for life sciences syllabus on imaging techniques. Use blue-shifted light or higher NA for sub-180 nm in practice, but 180 nm is the textbook confocal benchmark for 500 nm.


