49. In Neurospora a cross between the genotypes ‘A’ and ‘a’ results in an ascus with ascospores of genotypes as shown below:
Statements A to D areevents that could have occurred during meiosis.
A) Crossing over between the centromere and the gene.
B) Segregation of alleles ‘A’ and ‘a’ in meiosis I.
C) Segregation of alleles ‘A’ and ‘a’ in meiosis II.
D) Assortment of alleles ‘A’ and ‘a’.
Which of the above events could correctly explain the observation shown in the figure?
(1) A followed by C (2) C alone
(3) A followed b (4) D alone
In this Neurospora ordered ascus, the pattern A A a a a a A A can be explained only if there is crossing over between the gene and the centromere followed by segregation of alleles in meiosis II (second division segregation). Therefore, the correct option is: A followed by C (option 1).
Brief introduction
The classic CSIR NET June 2011 Neurospora tetrad analysis question uses an ordered ascus with genotype pattern A A a a a a A A to test understanding of centromere mapping and first- vs second-division segregation. Correct interpretation of this octad pattern requires recognizing how a crossover between the gene and centromere alters the order of alleles during meiosis.
Understanding the ascus pattern
In Neurospora, the eight ascospores in an ascus are linearly ordered and directly reflect the sequence of chromatids at meiosis, making it possible to track segregation of alleles relative to the centromere. When there is no crossover between a gene and its centromere, alleles separate at meiosis I (first division segregation), giving a 4:4 pattern (e.g., AAAAaaaa); when crossing over occurs between the gene and the centromere, alleles often segregate at meiosis II (second division segregation), producing patterns such as 2:2:2:2 or 2:4:2 like A A a a a a A A.
In the given ascus, A A a a a a A A shows two A spores, then four a spores, then two A spores; this is a typical 2:4:2 second-division segregation pattern that arises when a single crossover occurs between the locus A and the centromere before meiosis I. Post-meiotic mitosis in Neurospora duplicates each meiotic product, so the octad preserves the order generated by the crossover and subsequent meiotic divisions.
Option-wise explanation
The statements in the question:
A) Crossing over between the centromere and the gene.
B) Segregation of alleles ‘A’ and ‘a’ in meiosis I.
C) Segregation of alleles ‘A’ and ‘a’ in meiosis II.
D) Assortment of alleles ‘A’ and ‘a’.
-
Option A (crossing over between centromere and gene):
A crossover between the gene and its centromere is exactly what produces second-division segregation patterns like 2:4:2 or 2:2:2:2 in Neurospora ordered asci. Without such a crossover, the alleles would segregate at meiosis I and give a simple 4 A : 4 a pattern, not the observed A A a a a a A A arrangement, so statement A is necessary and correct. -
Option B (segregation in meiosis I):
First-division segregation of A and a means the two alleles go to opposite poles at meiosis I, yielding four A-bearing nuclei on one side and four a-bearing nuclei on the other, which after mitosis gives an orderly 4:4 pattern like A A A A a a a a. Since the observed pattern is 2:4:2 rather than 4:4, it cannot be explained by segregation of A and a at meiosis I alone, so statement B is not consistent with the given ascus. -
Option C (segregation in meiosis II):
Second-division segregation occurs when a crossover between the gene and centromere causes sister chromatids carrying different alleles to separate only at meiosis II, leading to 2:4:2 or 2:2:2:2 patterns in the octad. The A A a a a a A A pattern is of this 2:4:2 type, so the actual separation of A and a must have taken place at meiosis II, making statement C correct. -
Option D (assortment of alleles ‘A’ and ‘a’):
“Assortment” here refers to independent assortment of alleles, which would produce a random mixture rather than a structured 2:4:2 block pattern in an ordered ascus. The very regular linear arrangement observed indicates specific crossover and segregation events, not simple assortment, so statement D alone cannot account for the pattern and is therefore incorrect.
Identifying the correct combination
Because the A A a a a a A A pattern is a clear second-division segregation pattern, it requires:
-
a crossover between the gene A and the centromere (statement A), and
-
segregation of alleles A and a at meiosis II (statement C).
Segregation in meiosis I (B) would give a 4:4 pattern, and assortment alone (D) does not explain the ordered 2:4:2 arrangement, so they are excluded. Thus, the only combination that correctly explains the ascus is A followed by C, which corresponds to option (1).