(DEC 2013 GU) 69. If the product of an enzyme binds to the enzyme- substrate complex to exhibit its activity through a decrease in both Km and Vmax, this type of inhibition is called (1) competitive inhibition (2) non-competitive inhibition. (3) uncompetitive inhibition. (4) partially-competitive inhibition.

(DEC 2013 GU)
69. If the product of an enzyme binds to the enzyme- substrate complex to exhibit its activity through a decrease in both Km and Vmax, this type of inhibition is called
(1) competitive inhibition
(2) non-competitive inhibition.
(3) uncompetitive inhibition.
(4) partially-competitive inhibition.

The correct answer is (4) Reaction cannot be favorably biased by increasing substrate concentration.


Introduction

Competitive inhibition is a key biochemical concept describing how enzymes can be regulated or inhibited by molecules resembling the substrate. This inhibition is characterized by reversible active site binding and competition between inhibitor and substrate molecules. A widespread misconception is that the reaction rate cannot be favorably biased by increasing substrate concentration—the contrary is true. This article clarifies the features of competitive inhibition, highlighting why increased substrate levels can restore reaction rates despite inhibition.


Features of Competitive Inhibition

  • Substrate Mimicry: The inhibitor resembles the substrate structurally and binds the active site.

  • Inhibition Mechanism: By occupying the active site, the inhibitor blocks substrate binding.

  • Reversibility: Inhibitor binding is reversible; increasing substrate concentrations outcompete the inhibitor.

  • Kinetic Effect: Increases apparent Km, indicating reduced substrate affinity, but Vmax remains unchanged.


Why Option (4) is False

  • Increasing substrate concentration increases likelihood of substrate binding over inhibitor, overcoming inhibition.

  • This reversibility distinguishes competitive inhibition from other types like non-competitive inhibition.

  • Thus, reaction rates can be favorably biased (increased) by raising substrate levels even during competitive inhibition.


Comparative Table

Statement True/False Reason/Explanation
(1) Structure same as substrate True Enables active site binding
(2) Inhibits substrate binding True Competes directly for active site
(3) Binds to active site True Defining feature of competitive inhibition
(4) Reaction cannot be favored by increasing substrate False Substrate outcompetes inhibitor; reaction favored

Real-World Implications

  • Many drugs function as competitive inhibitors allowing for dosage-dependent therapeutic effects.

  • Laboratory experiments exploit this principle to study enzyme kinetics and inhibition.


Conclusion

The false statement about competitive inhibition is that the reaction cannot be favorably biased by increasing substrate concentration. Competitive inhibition can be overcome by adding more substrate, restoring enzymatic activity, making option (4) inaccurate.

37 Comments
  • yashika
    September 12, 2025

    Uncompetitive

  • Kirti Agarwal
    September 12, 2025

    Uncompetative

  • Sakshi yadav
    September 12, 2025

    Un competative

    • Mahima Sharma
      September 17, 2025

      Uncompitative inhibition

  • Bharti yadav
    September 12, 2025

    uncompetitive inhibition.

  • Varsha Tatla
    September 13, 2025

    Partial compitative nd partial un compitative

  • Kanica Sunwalka
    September 13, 2025

    uncompetitive

  • Aakansha sharma Sharma
    September 13, 2025

    uncompetitive inhibition.

    • Rishita
      September 14, 2025

      Uncompetitive inhibitors

  • Rishita
    September 14, 2025

    Uncompetitive inhibitors

  • Pratibha Jain
    September 14, 2025

    Uncompetitive

  • Santosh Saini
    September 14, 2025

    Un competitive inhibition

  • Aartii sharma
    September 14, 2025

    Uncompetitive inhibition

  • anjani sharma
    September 14, 2025

    In uncompetative inhibition the km is reduced so Affinity increase and vmax decrease

  • Dharmpal Swami
    September 14, 2025

    Uncompetative inhibition

  • Konika Naval
    September 14, 2025

    Uncompetitive inhibition

  • Pallavi Ghangas
    September 14, 2025

    Uncompetitive inhibition

  • Palak Sharma
    September 14, 2025

    uncompetitive inhibition.

  • Ankita Pareek
    September 14, 2025

    Uncompitative inhibition

  • Priya dhakad
    September 14, 2025

    Uncompetitive inhibition

  • Soniya Shekhawat
    September 15, 2025

    Uncompetitive inhibition.

  • Vanshika Sharma
    September 15, 2025

    Uncompetitive inhibition

  • Mohd juber Ali
    September 15, 2025

    In uncompitative inhibition inhibitor binds at active site of ES complex the affinity of substarte toward enzyme is increase and km decrease vmax also decrese

  • Bhawna Choudhary
    September 15, 2025

    Uncompetitive inhibition is correct answer

  • Lokesh Kumawat
    September 15, 2025

    Uncompetitive inhibition is correct answer

  • Divya rani
    September 16, 2025

    In un competitive inhibition km is decrease so Affinity of substrate towards enzyme increase so vmax is also decrease.

  • Nilofar Khan
    September 16, 2025

    Un-competitive inhibition

  • Tanvi Panwar
    September 16, 2025

    Uncompetitive inhibition.

  • Payal Gaur
    September 16, 2025

    Uncompetitive inhibition

  • Muskan Yadav
    September 17, 2025

    Uncompetitive inhibition

  • priya khandal
    September 17, 2025

    uncompititive inhibition

  • Khushi Agarwal
    September 17, 2025

    Uncompitative inhibition

  • Avni
    September 17, 2025

    (3) uncompetitive inhibition.

  • Asha Gurzzar
    September 19, 2025

    Uncompetitive inhibition

  • Minal Sethi
    September 19, 2025

    uncompetitive

  • Aafreen Khan
    September 22, 2025

    Uncompetitive inhibition is correct answer

  • Kajal
    September 25, 2025

    Uncompetitive inhibition

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Courses