38. If a gamete produced following non disjunction of a chromosome at second meiotic division was fertilized by a normal gamete, what is the expected frequency of trisomic progeny? (1) 1/4 (2) 2/4 (3) 3/4 (4) 1

38. If a gamete produced following non disjunction of a chromosome at second meiotic division was fertilized by a normal gamete, what is the expected frequency of trisomic progeny?
(1) 1/4               (2) 2/4
(3) 3/4               (4) 1

Logic of the situation

  • The cell produces four daughter cells.

  • Two are haploid (n) → completely normal chromosome number.

  • Two are aneuploid → one has n+1, the other n−1 for that chromosome.

This pattern arises when:

  1. Meiosis I is normal

    • Homologous chromosomes segregate correctly → two secondary cells, each with n chromosomes (as paired sister chromatids).

  2. Nondisjunction occurs in Meiosis II in ONE of those cells

    • Sister chromatids for a particular chromosome fail to separate.

    • That faulty cell produces:

      • One gamete with n+1

      • One gamete with n−1

    • The other secondary cell divides normally → two haploid (n) gametes.

So the four products are: n+1, n−1, n, n (two aneuploids, two haploids).


Option-wise explanation

  1. Non-disjunction during first meiotic division only

    • Error at meiosis I sends both homologues to the same pole.

    • After meiosis II, all four gametes are abnormal: two n+1 and two n−1, with no normal n cells.

    • Does not match the described mix of 2 normal + 2 aneuploid.

  2. Non-disjunction during second meiotic division only – correct

    • As shown above, yields exactly two aneuploid and two haploid daughter cells.

  3. Non-disjunction during either first or second meiotic divisions

    • Too broad; meiosis I errors give 4 aneuploid products, which contradicts the scenario.

  4. Non-disjunction during both first and second meiotic divisions

    • Would create a more complex set of severely abnormal gametes, not a simple 2 normal + 2 aneuploid pattern.

Therefore, the situation described can only be explained by nondisjunction in the second meiotic division (option 2).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Courses