1.Column A lists names of evolutionary biologists and column B lists descriptions of evolutionary mechanisms proposed by them in random order (1) A-(i), B-(ii), C-(iv), D-(iii) (2) A-(ii), B-(iii), C-(i), D-(iv) (3) A-(iii), B-(i), C-(ii), D-(iv) (4) A-(ii), B-(iii), C-(iv), D-(i)

1.Column A lists names of evolutionary biologists and column B lists descriptions of evolutionary mechanisms proposed by them in random order

(1) A-(i), B-(ii), C-(iv), D-(iii)
(2) A-(ii), B-(iii), C-(i), D-(iv)
(3) A-(iii), B-(i), C-(ii), D-(iv)
(4) A-(ii), B-(iii), C-(iv), D-(i)

Introduction to Evolutionary Mechanisms and Their Proponents

Evolutionary biology has been shaped by numerous scientists who proposed different mechanisms explaining how species change over time. Understanding which biologist proposed which mechanism is crucial for students and enthusiasts of biology. This article clarifies the correct matching of four prominent evolutionary biologists with their respective evolutionary mechanisms.

The Biologists and Their Evolutionary Mechanisms

We have four key figures in evolutionary biology:

  • A. Jean-Baptiste Lamarck

  • B. Charles Darwin

  • C. Motoo Kimura

  • D. Sewall Wright

Each of these scientists contributed uniquely to our understanding of evolution, proposing distinct mechanisms:

Biologist Proposed Mechanism Description
Jean-Baptiste Lamarck Inheritance of acquired characters
Charles Darwin Differential reproduction of genotypes (natural selection)
Motoo Kimura Variation at the molecular level is selectively neutral
Sewall Wright Changes in allele frequency due to random genetic drift

Detailed Explanation of Each Mechanism

1. Lamarck’s Inheritance of Acquired Characters

Lamarck was among the earliest to propose a mechanism of evolution. He suggested that traits acquired during an organism’s lifetime could be passed on to offspring. For example, he believed that giraffes’ necks became longer because their ancestors stretched to reach leaves, and this trait was inherited by subsequent generations. Although later disproved by genetics, Lamarck’s idea was foundational in sparking evolutionary thought.

2. Darwin’s Natural Selection

Charles Darwin revolutionized biology by introducing natural selection as the primary mechanism of evolution. He argued that individuals with traits better suited to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce, passing those advantageous traits to the next generation. This process leads to the differential reproduction of genotypes and gradual adaptation of species over time.

3. Kimura’s Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution

Motoo Kimura proposed that most genetic variation at the molecular level is selectively neutral, meaning it does not affect an organism’s fitness. According to Kimura, genetic drift rather than natural selection is responsible for much of the molecular evolution, especially in DNA sequences. This theory added a new dimension to evolutionary biology by emphasizing the role of random changes in genetics.

4. Wright’s Genetic Drift

Sewall Wright introduced the concept of genetic drift, which describes random fluctuations in allele frequencies within a population. Unlike natural selection, genetic drift is a stochastic process that can cause significant genetic changes, especially in small populations. Wright’s work highlighted the importance of chance in evolution alongside selection.

Correct Matching of Biologists to Mechanisms

Based on the descriptions above, the correct matching is:

Column A (Biologist) Column B (Mechanism)
A. Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (ii) Inheritance of acquired characters
B. Charles Darwin (iii) Differential reproduction of genotypes
C. Motoo Kimura (i) Variation at the molecular level is selectively neutral
D. Sewall Wright (iv) Changes in allele frequency due to random genetic drift

This corresponds to option (2):
A-(ii), B-(iii), C-(i), D-(iv).

Why This Matching Matters

Understanding these mechanisms and their proponents is essential for grasping the complexity of evolutionary biology. Each mechanism explains different aspects of how species evolve:

  • Lamarck’s idea, though outdated, was a stepping stone in evolutionary theory.

  • Darwin’s natural selection remains the cornerstone of evolutionary biology.

  • Kimura’s neutral theory provides insight into molecular evolution beyond natural selection.

  • Wright’s genetic drift emphasizes the role of randomness and population size in evolution.

Together, these mechanisms offer a comprehensive picture of evolutionary processes.

Conclusion

The study of evolution is enriched by the contributions of many scientists, each providing unique insights. Correctly associating evolutionary biologists with their proposed mechanisms helps clarify how species change over time. The accurate matching is:

  • Lamarck with inheritance of acquired traits,

  • Darwin with natural selection,

  • Kimura with neutral molecular variation,

  • Wright with genetic drift.

This understanding is fundamental for students, educators, and anyone interested in the science of life’s diversity.

SEO-Friendly Slugs

  • evolutionary-biologists-and-their-mechanisms

  • matching-evolutionary-theories-with-scientists

  • darwin-lamarck-kimura-wright-evolution-explained

  • understanding-evolutionary-mechanisms

  • key-evolutionary-biologists-and-their-contributions

This article provides a clear, authoritative guide to matching evolutionary biologists with their theories, aiding comprehension and academic success.

2 Comments
  • Manisha choudhary
    October 2, 2025

    2nd is correct answer

  • Sonal Nagar
    November 10, 2025

    Option 2nd

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Courses