UB-induced DNA damage cause advancing replication forks to stall. To avoid a collapse of these stalled replication forks the cell uses: (1) non-homologous end joining (2) lesion bypasss (3) mismatch repair (4) base excision repair 
  1. UB-induced DNA damage cause advancing replication forks to stall. To avoid a collapse of these stalled replication forks the cell uses:
    (1) non-homologous end joining
    (2) lesion bypasss
    (3) mismatch repair
    (4) base excision repair

    How Cells Prevent Replication Fork Collapse Caused by UV-Induced DNA Damage: The Role of Lesion Bypass

    Ultraviolet (UV) radiation is a common environmental mutagen that induces DNA damage, primarily in the form of pyrimidine dimers. These lesions distort the DNA helix and pose significant challenges to the advancing replication forks during DNA synthesis. When replication forks encounter UV-induced DNA damage, they often stall, risking fork collapse and genomic instability. To maintain replication progression and genome integrity, cells employ specialized mechanisms to bypass these lesions.


    UV-Induced DNA Damage and Replication Fork Stalling

    • Pyrimidine dimers, such as cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs), are the primary UV-induced lesions.

    • These bulky lesions block the replicative DNA polymerases, causing the replication machinery to stall.

    • Prolonged stalling can lead to replication fork collapse, resulting in double-strand breaks and chromosomal abnormalities.


    Cellular Strategy to Avoid Replication Fork Collapse: Lesion Bypass

    To prevent fork collapse, cells utilize lesion bypass mechanisms, also known as translesion synthesis (TLS) or damage tolerance pathways, which allow replication to continue past DNA lesions without immediately repairing them.

    • Lesion bypass involves specialized TLS DNA polymerases that can synthesize DNA across damaged templates.

    • These polymerases have flexible active sites that accommodate distorted DNA and insert nucleotides opposite lesions.

    • Although TLS polymerases are error-prone, their activity is crucial for preventing replication fork collapse and maintaining cell viability.


    Why Other Repair Mechanisms Are Not Suitable for Immediate Fork Restart

    1. Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ):

      • Repairs double-strand breaks by directly ligating DNA ends without homology.

      • Not involved in bypassing replication-blocking lesions or preventing fork stalling.

    2. Mismatch Repair (MMR):

      • Corrects base mismatches and small insertion/deletion loops post-replication.

      • Does not bypass bulky lesions or restart stalled forks.

    3. Base Excision Repair (BER):

      • Repairs small, non-helix-distorting base lesions like oxidized or alkylated bases.

      • Not effective against bulky UV-induced lesions blocking replication.


    Summary Table

    Repair Mechanism Role in UV-Induced Fork Stalling Suitable for Fork Restart?
    Non-Homologous End Joining Repairs DSBs, not lesion bypass No
    Lesion Bypass (TLS) Bypasses lesions allowing replication to continue Yes
    Mismatch Repair Corrects replication errors, not bulky lesions No
    Base Excision Repair Removes small base lesions, not bulky UV lesions No

    Correct Answer

    (2) Lesion bypass


    Related Keywords for SEO Optimization

    • UV-induced DNA damage

    • Replication fork stalling and collapse

    • Lesion bypass mechanisms

    • Translesion synthesis DNA polymerases

    • DNA damage tolerance pathways

    • Pyrimidine dimer bypass

    • DNA replication stress response

    • DNA repair and replication fork stability

    • DNA damage-induced replication fork restart

    • Genome stability and DNA damage



    Conclusion

    When UV-induced DNA damage causes replication forks to stall, cells rely on lesion bypass mechanisms, particularly translesion synthesis, to allow replication to continue past the lesions. This prevents fork collapse and preserves genomic integrity. Other repair pathways like non-homologous end joining, mismatch repair, and base excision repair do not directly facilitate replication fork restart in the presence of bulky UV lesions.

    Correct answer: (2) lesion bypass

13 Comments
  • Priyanka choudhary
    August 1, 2025

    Right answer is lesion bypasss

  • Neelam Sharma
    November 7, 2025

    lesion bypasss

  • Divya rani
    November 7, 2025

    Uv induced DNA damage cause advancing replication fork to stall. To avoid a collapse of these stalled replication forks the cell uses lesion bypass because it is a damge tolerance pathway the repair is occur after replication complete it is a error prone mechanism .

  • Sonal Nagar
    November 7, 2025

    lesion bypass

  • Roopal Sharma
    November 7, 2025

    Lesion bypass

  • Deepika Sheoran
    November 8, 2025

    Replication fork Restart in the presence of bulky uv lesions.

  • Rishita
    November 8, 2025

    Lesion bypass

  • Mohd juber Ali
    November 8, 2025

    Tls (damage or lesion bypass

  • Dipti Sharma
    November 8, 2025

    Bypasses lesions

  • Parul
    November 9, 2025

    To prevent replication fork collapse due to UV induced DNA damage cell uses lesion bypass mechanisms.

  • Heena Mahlawat
    November 9, 2025

    Lesion bypass

  • Neeraj Sharma
    November 21, 2025

    If uv exposed mutation or dimer is formed in replication fork than it will be bypassed by trans lesion DNA synthesis mechanism so that cell can survive first

  • Kajal
    November 23, 2025

    Lesion bypass

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Courses